Magic Chef MCM990STB vs Whirlpool WMCS3019RS
At 20 1/2" wide, the Whirlpool is 1 1/4" narrower than the Magic Chef — a meaningful difference in tight spaces.
Bottom line
The Whirlpool has the edge — it offers a smaller footprint that the Magic Chef doesn't.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Magic Chef MCM990STB | Whirlpool WMCS3019RS |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 900W | 900W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 0.90 cu ft | 0.90 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 21 3/4" | 20 1/2" ✓ |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 12 3/4" | 12 1/8" ✓ |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 19 1/4" | 15 7/8" ✓ |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 10" | 10 5/8" ✓ |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Magic Chef MCM990STB
Sponsored Whirlpool WMCS3019RS
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: