Galanz GLCMKZ07BKR07 vs Whirlpool WMC20005
The Whirlpool WMC20005 is 50W more powerful (750W vs 700W), which means faster cooking and more even results. The Galanz offers more interior space (0.70 vs 0.50 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Whirlpool is more compact on the counter. At 14 1/8" wide, the Galanz is 1 1/4" narrower than the Whirlpool — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Galanz adds sensor cooking that the Whirlpool lacks.
Bottom line
The Galanz has the edge — it offers more interior space and a smaller footprint that the Whirlpool doesn't.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Galanz GLCMKZ07BKR07 | Whirlpool WMC20005 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 700W | 750W ✓ |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 0.70 cu ft ✓ | 0.50 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 14 1/8" ✓ | 15 3/8" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 9 1/2" ✓ | 9 7/8" |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 17 1/2" | 13 3/4" ✓ |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 9 5/8" | 10" ✓ |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | Yes ✓ | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Galanz GLCMKZ07BKR07
Sponsored Whirlpool WMC20005
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: