Magic Chef MC77MW vs Whirlpool WMC20005
The Whirlpool WMC20005 is 50W more powerful (750W vs 700W), which means faster cooking and more even results. The Magic Chef offers more interior space (0.70 vs 0.50 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Whirlpool is more compact on the counter.
Bottom line
The Magic Chef has the edge — it offers more interior space that the Whirlpool doesn't.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Magic Chef MC77MW | Whirlpool WMC20005 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 700W | 750W ✓ |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 0.70 cu ft ✓ | 0.50 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 14 7/8" ✓ | 15 3/8" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 10" | 9 7/8" ✓ |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 12 1/2" ✓ | 13 3/4" |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 9 1/2" | 10" ✓ |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
| Amperage Lower draw works on shared circuits. | 9.2A | — |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Magic Chef MC77MW
Sponsored Whirlpool WMC20005
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
⇄ Magic Chef MC77MW vs NUENSS-ROR EM720CB7 ⇄ ARLIME 309b1d8f-da62-4051-876b-ad573f145fbb vs Magic Chef MC77MW ⇄ Galanz GLCMKZ07BKR07 vs Magic Chef MC77MW ⇄ ARLIME AR-0004-84 vs Magic Chef MC77MW ⇄ NUENSS-ROR EM720CB7 vs Whirlpool WMC20005 ⇄ ARLIME 309b1d8f-da62-4051-876b-ad573f145fbb vs Whirlpool WMC20005
See the full spec sheet for each model: