Sharp SMC1662DS vs Whirlpool WMC30516AW
The Whirlpool adds sensor cooking that the Sharp lacks.
Bottom line
The Whirlpool has the edge — it offers sensor cooking that the Sharp doesn't.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Sharp SMC1662DS | Whirlpool WMC30516AW |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 1100W | 1100W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 1.60 cu ft | 1.60 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 21 3/4" ✓ | 21 7/8" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 12 3/4" | 12 1/2" ✓ |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 17 3/4" | 17 1/8" ✓ |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 14 1/2" ✓ | 13 1/2" |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | Yes ✓ |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Sharp SMC1662DS
Sponsored Whirlpool WMC30516AW
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: