Kenmore KMOMJB17S2B-10 vs Midea MMO19S3AST
The Midea offers more interior space (1.90 vs 1.70 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Kenmore is more compact on the counter. At 19" wide, the Kenmore is 1" narrower than the Midea — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Kenmore adds inverter technology that the Midea lacks.
Bottom line
Choose the Kenmore if you prioritise a smaller footprint and inverter power for even heating; go with the Midea if more interior space matters more to you.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Kenmore KMOMJB17S2B-10 | Midea MMO19S3AST |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 1000W | 1000W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 1.70 cu ft | 1.90 cu ft ✓ |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 19" ✓ | 20" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 10 3/4" ✓ | 19" |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 14 7/8" ✓ | 33" |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 13 1/2" | 14" ✓ |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | Yes ✓ | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Kenmore KMOMJB17S2B-10
Sponsored Midea MMO19S3AST
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: