Galanz GSWWA14S1SA10 vs Sharp SMC1469KS

The Sharp SMC1469KS is 100W more powerful (1100W vs 1000W), which means faster cooking and more even results. At 19" wide, the Galanz is 1 3/8" narrower than the Sharp — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Galanz adds convection baking and air fry that the Sharp lacks. The Sharp adds sensor cooking and inverter technology and WiFi connectivity that the Galanz lacks.

Bottom line

Choose the Galanz if you prioritise a smaller footprint and convection baking; go with the Sharp if faster cooking and inverter power for even heating matters more to you.

Galanz

GSWWA14S1SA10

Medium (Mid-Size)

Wins 5 of 9

View full specs →

Sharp

SMC1469KS

Medium (Mid-Size)

Wins 4 of 9

View full specs →

Spec Comparison

Spec	Galanz GSWWA14S1SA10	Sharp SMC1469KS
Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly.	1000W	1100W ✓
Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes.	1.40 cu ft	1.40 cu ft
Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces.	19" ✓	20 3/8"
Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances.	10 3/4" ✓	12 3/8"
Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters.	14 7/8" ✓	18 1/8"
Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates.	12 3/8"	12 3/8"
Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing.	No	Yes ✓
Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating.	No	Yes ✓
Convection	Yes ✓	No
Air Fry	Yes ✓	No
WiFi / Smart	No	Yes ✓