Galanz GSWWA10S1SA10 vs Kenmore KMOMJK12S2SW-10

The Kenmore offers more interior space (1.20 vs 1.00 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Galanz is more compact on the counter. At 17 1/4" wide, the Galanz is 1 3/4" narrower than the Kenmore — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Galanz adds convection baking and air fry that the Kenmore lacks. The Kenmore adds sensor cooking that the Galanz lacks.

Bottom line

Choose the Galanz if you prioritise a smaller footprint and convection baking; go with the Kenmore if more interior space and sensor cooking matters more to you.

Galanz

GSWWA10S1SA10

Medium (Mid-Size)

Wins 3 of 7

View full specs →

Kenmore

KMOMJK12S2SW-10

Medium (Mid-Size)

Wins 4 of 7

View full specs →

Spec Comparison

Spec	Galanz GSWWA10S1SA10	Kenmore KMOMJK12S2SW-10
Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly.	1000W	1000W
Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes.	1.00 cu ft	1.20 cu ft ✓
Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces.	17 1/4" ✓	19"
Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances.	16 7/8"	10 3/4" ✓
Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters.	29 7/8"	14 7/8" ✓
Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates.	12 3/8"	12 3/8"
Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing.	No	Yes ✓
Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating.	No	No
Convection	Yes ✓	No
Air Fry	Yes ✓	No
WiFi / Smart	No	No