COSTWAY B082VCK3RR vs GE PEM31SFSS
The COSTWAY B082VCK3RR is 100W more powerful (900W vs 800W), which means faster cooking and more even results. At 12 3/4" wide, the GE is 1 1/4" narrower than the COSTWAY — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The COSTWAY adds sensor cooking that the GE lacks.
Bottom line
Choose the COSTWAY if you prioritise faster cooking and sensor cooking; go with the GE if a smaller footprint matters more to you.
⚠️ These models are in different size categories. You may want to compare within the same size for more relevant results.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | COSTWAY B082VCK3RR | GE PEM31SFSS |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 900W ✓ | 800W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 0.90 cu ft | 1.00 cu ft ✓ |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 14" | 12 3/4" ✓ |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 11" ✓ | 12 1/4" |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 19 1/2" ✓ | 24" |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 10" | 10 5/8" ✓ |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | Yes ✓ | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
COSTWAY B082VCK3RR
Sponsored GE PEM31SFSS
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: