MWF

Cosmo CMO-SS1 vs Thor Kitchen TOR24SS

The Thor Kitchen offers more interior space (1.40 vs 1.20 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Cosmo is more compact on the counter. At 21 7/8" wide, the Cosmo is 2" narrower than the Thor Kitchen — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Thor Kitchen adds sensor cooking that the Cosmo lacks.

Bottom line

Choose the Cosmo if you prioritise a smaller footprint; go with the Thor Kitchen if more interior space and sensor cooking matters more to you.

Cosmo CMO-SS1
Cosmo
CMO-SS1
Medium (Mid-Size)
Wins 3 of 5
Thor Kitchen TOR24SS
Thor Kitchen
TOR24SS
Medium (Mid-Size)
Wins 2 of 5

Spec Comparison

Spec Cosmo CMO-SS1 Thor Kitchen TOR24SS
Wattage
Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly.
1000W 1000W
Capacity
Larger capacity fits bigger dishes.
1.20 cu ft 1.40 cu ft
Width
Narrower fits tighter counter spaces.
21 7/8" 23 7/8"
Height
Shorter clears low cabinet clearances.
7 1/2" 17 1/2"
Depth
Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters.
12 1/4" 16 3/4"
Turntable
Larger turntable fits bigger plates.
12 3/8" 12 3/8"
Sensor Cooking
Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing.
No Yes
Inverter
True variable power for better defrost and reheating.
No No
Convection No No
Air Fry No No
WiFi / Smart No No

✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.

Alternate Microwaves

Similar models in this size and power range

Related Comparisons

See the full spec sheet for each model: