Cosmo CMO-SS1 vs Sharp SMO1461GS
The Sharp offers more interior space (1.40 vs 1.20 cu ft), fitting larger dishes and casseroles. The Cosmo is more compact on the counter. At 21 7/8" wide, the Cosmo is 2" narrower than the Sharp — a meaningful difference in tight spaces.
Bottom line
Choose the Cosmo if you prioritise a smaller footprint; go with the Sharp if more interior space matters more to you.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Cosmo CMO-SS1 | Sharp SMO1461GS |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 1000W | 1000W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 1.20 cu ft | 1.40 cu ft ✓ |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 21 7/8" ✓ | 23 7/8" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 7 1/2" ✓ | 17 1/2" |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 12 1/4" ✓ | 16 3/4" |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 12 3/8" | 12 3/8" |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | No |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Cosmo CMO-SS1
Sponsored Sharp SMO1461GS
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: