Amana RFS12TS vs Panasonic SN67QS
The Panasonic SN67QS is 50W more powerful (1250W vs 1200W), which means faster cooking and more even results. At 20 3/4" wide, the Panasonic is 1" narrower than the Amana — a meaningful difference in tight spaces. The Panasonic adds sensor cooking and inverter technology and WiFi connectivity that the Amana lacks.
Bottom line
The Panasonic has the edge — it offers a smaller footprint and inverter power for even heating that the Amana doesn't.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Amana RFS12TS | Panasonic SN67QS |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 1200W | 1250W ✓ |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 1.20 cu ft | 1.20 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 21 3/4" | 20 3/4" ✓ |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 14 3/8" | 11 7/8" ✓ |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 21" | 15 7/8" ✓ |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 12 3/8" | 12 3/8" |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | Yes ✓ |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | Yes ✓ |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | Yes ✓ |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Amana RFS12TS
Sponsored Panasonic SN67QS
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: